HF595

Election judge party affiliation classified as public data on individuals.
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)

Related bill: SF640

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

This bill changes how data about election judges’ political party affiliation is treated. It requires that the major political party affiliation of election judges (or a notice of no affiliation) be treated as public data and stored in a publicly accessible list. It also repeals a prior rule that allowed sharing of this information only among election judges within the same precinct for balance checks.

Main Provisions

  • Section 1: Adds to existing data practices rules that the party affiliation of election judges is classified as public data, following the rules in another section (204B.21 subdivision 4).
  • Section 2: Adds a new requirement to 204B.21 establishing a process where each appointing authority must keep a list of all election judges with their major party affiliation or a statement of no affiliation. This list is public data on individuals.
  • Section 3: Repeals a previous provision (204B.21 subdivision 3) that allowed sharing of an election judge’s party affiliation with other election judges in the same precinct for party balance checks, with a restriction that the information not be disclosed or used for other purposes.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

  • Public data classification: Election judge major party affiliation becomes public data.
  • New public list: Each appointing authority must maintain a public list of election judges and their major party affiliations (or non-affiliation).
  • Removal of limited sharing: The prior exception allowing judges to share affiliation information for balance verification is repealed; under the new scheme, the data is publicly available rather than restricted for internal use.

Practical Implications

  • Increased transparency: The party affiliations of election judges will be accessible to the public.
  • Privacy considerations: Judges’ political affiliations will no longer be restricted to insiders, which may raise privacy concerns for some individuals.
  • Administrative change: Agencies must create and maintain a public list of election judges with party affiliation.

Relevant Terms - election judge - party affiliation - major political party affiliation - public data on individuals - appointing authority - list of election judges - balance requirements - data practices (Minnesota Data Practices Act) - Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 13.607 - Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 204B.21

Bill text versions

Showing the most recent version. There are  2  total versions. You must be logged in  to view additional bill text versions.

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
February 13, 2025HouseActionIntroduction and first reading, referred toJudiciary Finance and Civil Law

Citations

You must be logged in  to view citations.

Progress through the legislative process

17%
In Committee
Loading…