HF4474

Revocation and licensing requirements established for violations of impaired driving laws involving substances other than alcohol, rulemaking authorized, and money appropriated.
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)

Related bill: SF4665

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

  • Establish a new framework for revoking, denying, and reinstating driving privileges when the driver is impaired by substances other than alcohol.
  • Create and fund programs to enforce these rules, including ignition interlock and substance use testing requirements.
  • Update Minnesota law to address drug-impaired driving and related offenses, and provide rules for implementing these changes.

Key Terms Used in the Bill

  • Alcohol-related violation
  • Substancerelated violation
  • Ignition interlock device (IID)
  • Ignition interlock program
  • Substance use testing program
  • Qualified prior impaired driving incident
  • Driving while impaired (DWI) and related offenses
  • Restricted license
  • Program participant

Main Provisions and What They Do

  • Redefined categories and definitions

    • Creates two main categories of violations: alcohol-related violations and substance-related violations (including drugs and cannabis products).
    • Introduces the ignition interlock device and a substance use testing program as required remedies for certain violations.
  • Revocation, denial, and reinstatement rules

    • Sets specific license revocation periods based on:
    • Whether there were prior impaired driving incidents
    • Type of violation (alcohol-related vs substance-related)
    • Whether the incident caused bodily harm, great bodily harm, or death
    • Adds special rules for out-of-state convictions that would be grounds for revocation in Minnesota.
    • Establishes a process for denying or canceling licenses when a driver is deemed inimical to public safety (two or more qualified prior incidents).
  • Test refusal and test failure consequences

    • Defines how long a license must be revoked if the driver refuses to submit to tests or if test results show impairment.
    • Specifies longer revocation periods for young drivers or for higher levels of impairment.
  • Ignition interlock and testing requirements

    • Requires program participants to install and keep an ignition interlock device in any vehicle they drive (with limited exceptions for employer vehicles).
    • Requires participation in the ignition interlock program (and/or the substance use testing program) as a condition of reinstating full driving privileges.
    • Allows restrictions or conditional reinstatement (e.g., a restricted license) while still in the program.
    • Provides processes for extending program requirements if a participant tests positive or fails to meet abstinence or treatment standards.
  • Rehabilitation and treatment prerequisites

    • Before full reinstatement, participants with certain prior incidents or chemical use assessments must complete a licensed treatment or rehabilitation program.
    • Requires proof of abstinence comparable to the program’s standards before full driving privileges are restored.
  • Administrative details and implementation

    • The Department must implement rules, establish guidelines, and designate authorized installation centers for ignition interlock devices.
    • Requires proof of insurance coverage for vehicles equipped with an ignition interlock device in some cases.
    • Allows employers to permit employees to drive employer-owned vehicles under specific conditions.
  • Special provisions for restricted licenses

    • A restricted class D license can be issued to program participants under certain restrictions and guidelines.
    • The commissioner cannot require payment of certain reinstatement fees before issuing a restricted license, but full reinstatement requires paying those fees.
  • Termination and reentry into programs

    • If a participant’s license is withdrawn for non-alcohol-related reasons, they may still earn credit toward time in the ignition interlock program if they keep the device serviced.
    • Reentry into the program after termination is possible, but reinstatement timelines follow the longer of the applicable or previously required periods.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

  • New dual framework for impairment: separate handling for alcohol-related violations and substance-related violations (including cannabis and other drugs).
  • Expanded use of ignition interlock and new substance use testing programs as mandatory conditions of license reinstatement.
  • Longer and more flexible revocation periods tied to the severity of harm and prior history.
  • New designation of “inimical to public safety” leading to license cancellation and mandatory rehabilitation before reinstatement.
  • Reinstatement and restricted licensing processes that emphasize treatment, abstinence, and device compliance.
  • Clear integration of out-of-state convictions with Minnesota revocation rules.
  • Enhanced role of the Department in rulemaking and program administration, with funding authority for implementation.

Practical Effects (What This Means for Drivers)

  • People charged with drug-impaired driving or other substance-related impairments may face longer license suspensions and more stringent requirements to regain driving privileges.
  • If you have multiple impaired driving incidents, you could face longer revocation periods or even license cancellation.
  • Driving again after an impairment offense will likely require installing and operating an ignition interlock device and possibly participating in a substance use testing program and treatment.
  • Out-of-state offenses could trigger Minnesota revocation or stricter requirements.
  • In some cases, drivers may temporarily receive a restricted license with IID restrictions while completing program requirements.

Implementation Highlights

  • Department will set rules, guidelines, and installation centers for ignition interlock devices.
  • Programs require verification of insurance for vehicles with IID.
  • Reinstatement processes will require proof of treatment or abstinence and compliance with IID or testing program requirements.
  • Violations involving bodily harm or death carry stricter timelines and prerequisites for restoration of driving privileges.

Relevant Terms - alcohol-related violation - substancerelated violation - ignition interlock device (IID) - ignition interlock program - substance use testing program - driving while impaired (DWI) - qualified prior impaired driving incident - revocation - denial - reinstatement - restricted license - inimical to public safety - bodily harm - great bodily harm - death - out-of-state conviction - program participant - testing period - treatment or rehabilitation program - ignition interlock device program restrictions - insurance certification (noncancelable)

Bill text versions

Showing the most recent version. There are  1  total versions. You must be logged in  to view additional bill text versions.

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
March 18, 2026HouseActionIntroduction and first reading, referred toTransportation Finance and Policy

Citations

You must be logged in  to view citations.

Progress through the legislative process

17%
In Committee
Loading…