HF3711
Administrative hearings provisions amended for human rights cases.
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)
Related bill: SF3606
AI Generated Summary
Purpose
- To amend the administrative hearings provisions for human rights cases. The change creates a formal process where a commissioner’s determination can be examined as a contested case, with a binding report from an administrative law judge (ALJ) and a path to resolution through a formal hearing and appeal process.
Main Provisions
- A determination issued by the commissioner may be heard as a contested case.
- The ALJ’s report becomes binding on all parties and can be implemented by an order as provided in subdivision 3.
- A party contesting the commissioner’s determination may request a hearing, either on their own behalf or through a private attorney.
- The commissioner must decide within 30 days whether to forward the request for a hearing to the Office Court of Administrative Hearings (the bill's reference to the hearing body). The Office Court of Administrative Hearings shall promptly set the matter for hearing.
- The hearing location is designated by the commissioner and must be in the county where the unfair discriminatory practice occurred or where the respondent resides or has a principal place of business.
- The hearing is conducted under the procedures in sections 14.57 to 14.62 and is subject to appeal under sections 14.63 to 14.68.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- Establishes a formal contested-case hearing process for human rights determinations.
- Makes the ALJ’s report binding on all parties and suitable for implementation by an order.
- Allows a party to request a hearing with the option to appear personally or through a private attorney.
- Introduces a 30-day deadline for the commissioner to decide whether to forward the matter to the Office Court of Administrative Hearings for a hearing.
- Shifts the hearing process to the Office Court of Administrative Hearings and requires prompt scheduling.
- Specifies that hearings occur in the county where the discrimination occurred or where the respondent lives or has a principal place of business.
- Aligns the hearing and appeal process with existing statutory sections (14.57-14.62 for hearing; 14.63-14.68 for appeal).
Relevant Terms
- unfair discriminatory practice
- commissioner
- administrative law judge (ALJ)
- binding
- order
- Office Court of Administrative Hearings
- 30 days
- contested case
- hearing
- private attorney
- respondent
- county
- Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 363A.29 subdivision 1
- Minnesota Human Rights Act
- sections 14.57 to 14.62
- sections 14.63 to 14.68
Past committee meetings
You must be logged in to view 1 past legislative committee meetings.
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 25, 2026 | House | Action | Introduction and first reading, referred to | Judiciary Finance and Civil Law | |
| April 07, 2026 | House | Action | Committee report, to adopt | ||
| April 07, 2026 | House | Action | Second reading |
Meeting documents
You must be logged in to view legislative committee meeting documents.
Citations
You must be logged in to view citations.
Progress through the legislative process
In Committee