HF4152

Health plans required to credit enrollees for services provided by an out-of-network provider at a lower cost than the plan's in-network providers, and commissioner of commerce enforcement authorized.
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)

Related bill: SF3993

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

  • This bill would require health plan companies to provide enrollees with clear cost information and create a new credit system for services obtained from out-of-network providers. The goal is to help enrollees understand and manage costs when using out-of-network care, and to encourage partial reimbursement of the higher out-of-network costs.

Key Provisions (What the bill does)

  • Disclosure of good faith estimates: Health plan companies must, within ten business days of a complete request, provide an enrollee with either:
    • a good faith estimate of the total payment the plan has contracted for with a specific provider, the enrollee’s share, and the enrollee’s out-of-pocket costs; or
    • the lowest allowable amount due for the service from a comparable in-network provider, for an out-of-network credit consideration.
    • Note: These estimates are not legally binding.
  • Definitions: The bill defines terms such as out-of-network provider, in-network cost difference, estimated in-network cost difference, and out-of-network credit.
  • Credit for out-of-network services: If an enrollee receives a service from an out-of-network provider and identifies a positive estimated in-network cost difference before the service, the health plan must issue a credit equal to 50% of that difference.
    • The credit can be applied immediately as an offset against the enrollee’s next payment, with certain limits.
    • Plans may require reasonable documentation of the good faith estimates, but cannot condition the actual service on obtaining the documentation.
  • Limits on credits: There is a maximum group of credits an enrollee can accumulate with a single health plan; credits may not be issued if the service is provided outside the U.S. or if the enrollee is delinquent on premium payments.
  • Prohibition on limiting plan design: Plans cannot impose cost-sharing, utilization review limits, or premium increases that would prevent an enrollee from using the out-of-network credit. This protection applies to existing plans, renewals, and changes.
  • Credit balance notices: Plans must provide a statement of an enrollee’s credit balance at least every specified number of months, showing accruals and uses.
  • Credit payout on plan termination: When a plan ends, the plan must pay the available out-of-network credit balance to the enrollee, with exceptions for nonpayment, misrepresentation, or fraud.
  • Application timing: The credit rules apply after the enrollee has met their plan’s deductible, to avoid affecting eligibility for certain tax-advantaged accounts or plans.
  • Enforcement: The Minnesota Commissioner of Commerce can investigate and enforce these provisions.
  • Tax treatment: The value of the out-of-network credit balance paid to an enrollee becomes a subtraction for state tax purposes.

How this changes existing law

  • Introduces a formal requirement for disclosure of good faith estimates of costs.
  • Creates a mandatory 50% credit of the estimated in-network cost difference for out-of-network services.
  • Establishes rules for how and when credits are applied, reported, and paid out, including immediate offset and annual/periodic balance notices.
  • Prohibits certain plan design changes or premium adjustments that would undermine the benefit.
  • Adds enforcement authority for the state’s Commissioner of Commerce.
  • Adds a tax subtraction treatment for credit balances, affecting state tax calculations.

Significant Changes to Health Plans

  • New obligation to offer predictable cost information within 10 business days.
  • New obligation to provide a substantial credit for out-of-network services (50% of the estimated in-network difference).
  • New protections to ensure credits aren’t blocked by plan design changes and that balances are transparently communicated.
  • New termination payout requirement of available credits.
  • New enforcement and tax treatment provisions related to these credits.

Enforcement and Oversight

  • The Commissioner of Commerce will oversee and enforce these provisions, including investigations as needed.
  • Applies to existing and new plans, renewals, and changes within the state.

Definitions to Note

  • Out-of-network credit, estimated in-network cost difference, in-network cost difference, good faith estimate, allowable amount, out-of-network provider, and related terms used to describe costs, credits, and timing.

Practical Implications for Enrollees

  • If you choose an out-of-network provider and know there is a positive cost difference, you could receive a credit for 50% of that difference.
  • You’ll get a clear estimate of costs ahead of time, though it’s not a binding quote.
  • Your credit balance will be reported to you periodically and can be used to offset future payments, potentially reducing out-of-pocket spending.
  • When you leave the plan, you should receive any remaining credits, unless there are exceptions for nonpayment or fraud.
  • The plan cannot impose new charges or restrictions to block your ability to use these credits.

Relevant Terms out-of-network credit; good faith estimate; allowable amount; in-network cost difference; estimated in-network cost difference; out-of-network provider; health plan credit; next payment offset; deductible; health savings account (HSA) eligibility; catastrophic health plan eligibility; commissioner of commerce; notice of credit balance; credit balance; international vs domestic service; nonpayment; misrepresentation; fraud; utilization review; premium increase; enforcement.

Bill text versions

Showing the most recent version. There are  1  total versions. You must be logged in  to view additional bill text versions.

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
March 12, 2026HouseActionIntroduction and first reading, referred toCommerce Finance and Policy

Citations

You must be logged in  to view citations.

Progress through the legislative process

17%
In Committee
Loading…